Just looked at the four-part series. It can be certainly interpreted as predictive programming, but in my understanding, it actually warns about the dangers of AI...
A.I., yes, but they frame it like an amputation that will happen, the only question is, will they cut off half your arm or the full arm? They never let you choose to have no amputation at all. That is the predictive programming subtlety; they steer our minds to where they want us to go and have us forget we have free will, freedom of choice, and personal sovereignty.
We in a unrestricted warfare zone, everything is weaponized. We are in danger and must defend ourselves, our family, our interests and our communities.
In order to prevent any sudden resistance or hostile reaction from the general public, totalitarian organizations keeps adding subtle references to its planned future events in popular media so that when the event happens for real, the public is already mentally prepared and receptive to the new developments in the society.
This notion was first described and proposed by researcher and historian Alan Watt, who defines predictive programming as “a subtle form of psychological conditioning provided by the media to acquaint the public with planned societal changes to be implemented by our leaders. If and when these changes are put through, the public will already be familiarized with them and will accept them as natural progressions, thus lessening possible public resistance and commotion.”
Supporters of the predictive programming theory, suggest that the government also employs this technique so that people don’t lose trust in the already established system. They claim that first, the government plans a complex situation, then hides references of these in media so that people become somewhat accustomed to the feelings caused by these situations, and finally, when the situation actually does arise, the people will look to the government for solutions.
It is argued that, although governments already have the solution to the problem they created in the first place, they deliberately wait for the right time to implement the solution in order to cause the most damage to people’s ability to think for themselves. It is further claimed that predictive programming is actually a highly advanced form of AI used for the psychological conditioning of the masses.
Jesus never told us to be victims, punching bags or waifs. We are to be warriora for Christ. Defend ourselves, our family and our communities. We must be ready to resist violence and manipulation.
AMERICA WANTS NO PART OF NON HUMAN a-i
Just say no to AI.
Just looked at the four-part series. It can be certainly interpreted as predictive programming, but in my understanding, it actually warns about the dangers of AI...
A.I., yes, but they frame it like an amputation that will happen, the only question is, will they cut off half your arm or the full arm? They never let you choose to have no amputation at all. That is the predictive programming subtlety; they steer our minds to where they want us to go and have us forget we have free will, freedom of choice, and personal sovereignty.
We in a unrestricted warfare zone, everything is weaponized. We are in danger and must defend ourselves, our family, our interests and our communities.
In order to prevent any sudden resistance or hostile reaction from the general public, totalitarian organizations keeps adding subtle references to its planned future events in popular media so that when the event happens for real, the public is already mentally prepared and receptive to the new developments in the society.
This notion was first described and proposed by researcher and historian Alan Watt, who defines predictive programming as “a subtle form of psychological conditioning provided by the media to acquaint the public with planned societal changes to be implemented by our leaders. If and when these changes are put through, the public will already be familiarized with them and will accept them as natural progressions, thus lessening possible public resistance and commotion.”
Supporters of the predictive programming theory, suggest that the government also employs this technique so that people don’t lose trust in the already established system. They claim that first, the government plans a complex situation, then hides references of these in media so that people become somewhat accustomed to the feelings caused by these situations, and finally, when the situation actually does arise, the people will look to the government for solutions.
It is argued that, although governments already have the solution to the problem they created in the first place, they deliberately wait for the right time to implement the solution in order to cause the most damage to people’s ability to think for themselves. It is further claimed that predictive programming is actually a highly advanced form of AI used for the psychological conditioning of the masses.
Jesus never told us to be victims, punching bags or waifs. We are to be warriora for Christ. Defend ourselves, our family and our communities. We must be ready to resist violence and manipulation.